Are You At Risk From Workplace Pollution Causing Injury Or Illness?

Many of you will have heard of air pollution and the damage that it can do to our health as well as the planet that we live on, but have you ever heard of workplace air pollution? Workers that work in certain fields are exposed to this kind of pollution – whether they work outside, in a large factory or in an office.

So, What is Workplace Pollution?

Workplace pollution is any kind of pollution that you may be experiencing while you’re working. This could be hazardous chemicals, gases, dust, fumes, vapours or even noise that you are subjected to as you go about your job.

Workplace Pollution Injuries and Accidents

These pollutants are deemed hazardous if they can have a negative impact on your health in both the short and long-term. Those that are subjected to workplace pollution regularly and over a long period of time are those most likely to develop health problems, even if the pollution is at a relatively low level. This is why it is important to learn about workplace pollution and what it could mean for your health.

Air pollution is the type of workplace pollution that is the most common in the UK. This could be anything from fumes, dust, gases or anything else that can be breathed into our lungs through the air.

Could You Be At Risk in Your Workplace?

We are all at risk from pollution in one way or another, but when it comes to workplace pollution specifically, there are some professions which carry a larger risk for those working within them.

Below are some of the industries/professions where there is an increased risk of being subjected to prolonged exposure to workplace pollution:

Construction
Engineering
Mining
Textiles
Manufacturing
Auto Repair Shops
Dry Cleaning
Farming
Welding

While the above are some of the more obvious workplaces that could put you at risk, pretty much any workplace could carry a potential threat. A poorly ventilated office in London could be exposed to ground-level ozone outside due to workers opening windows and delivery drivers or haulage drivers will also be exposed to the same kind of risks. The same could be said for anyone working out in the open.

What Danger Does The Workplace Pose for Our Health?

The specific type of pollution or materials that you are breathing in will each have their own set of risks, but the more common risks that you will face from them is as follows:

Potential Damage to the Lungs: Your lungs will be inhaling this pollution so it is understandable that they will be at the most risk. Pollution can prevent the growth rate of lungs in children, can affect their performance in young adults/adults/elderly and it is also be a leading cause of lung cancer.
Potential Damage to the Heart: Stroke, angina, arrhythmia, hypertension and heart disease have been linked to workplace pollution in cases in the past. The heart is the most important muscle in the body, and can be put under various stressors related to workplace activities.
Asthma and Allergies: Breathing conditions can be affected both in the short term and long term, with asthma and allergies particularly being irritated. Another concern is that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can also be caused by regular exposure to workplace pollution.

Potential Symptoms of Workplace Pollution

Some of the more common symptoms that could indicate that you are suffering from the health effects of workplace pollution include:

Drowsiness
Headaches
Painful coughing
Difficulty breathing
Dry eyes, nose or throat

While many of these could be symptoms of something unrelated, if you are feeling any of them not long after leaving an affected area, there is a good chance that you are suffering the effects of workplace pollution. If you do not normally spend too much time in heavily affected areas but you have just come out of such an area and start to notice these symptoms, it is likely that you will be noticing them a lot more.

What to Do If You Think You Are Suffering From Workplace Pollution Related Symptoms?

If you are worried that you are experiencing any symptoms of workplace pollution, you should first keep track of the times you get these symptoms and the times when they go away. You should then take this to your health professional and explain the working conditions that you are subjected to.

Your health provider will then be better informed as to whether your symptoms really are a cause of workplace pollution, or due to something else.

If your doctor agrees that your symptoms are due to workplace pollution, you should share your concerns with your supervisors or managers and also seek as much advice on workplace pollution as you can from your local government advice centres and other qualified authorities.

How to Claim Compensation For Workplace Pollution?

If you have contracted an illness or injury from workplace pollution, gather any evidence you can and then speak to a personal injury solicitor that specialises in accidents at work or visit https://www.accidentclaims.co.uk/personal-injury-compensation/accident-at-work-compensation-claims . A personal injury solicitor that has experience in workplace accidents, injuries and illnesses will be able to look at your evidence and determine whether you have a good claim for compensation and give you the best advice on moving forward with a claim.

Are London’s New Cycle Lanes Bad For The Environment?

London’s new cycle lanes have been causing debate for well over a year now with many complaining that they are not providing a solution for congestion, but are instead making it worse.

The new cycle highways now take up more of the road compared to the previous bicycle lanes – almost a third of them in fact – which has reduced the amount of space for motorists. Increased congestion, traffic and pollution are reasons being put forward by those against the lanes whilst the opposite is being said by those in favour.

So, are these new cycle lanes bad for the environment or something that will help it in the long run? Well, there is no scientific evidence to back up either view as of yet but there are certainly strong arguments from either side of the debate.

Those ‘Against’ London’s New Cycle Lanes

Many of those ‘against’ the new cycle lanes which are taking up a larger section of the roads in the capital are understandably motorists. They claim that due to there being less space for motorists and more space for cyclists, congestion has increased leading to more time being stuck in traffic with their engines running. This in turn, in their opinion, could be leading to an increase in pollution – something that cycle lanes are instead supposed to decrease.

Even Mike Brown, the Commissioner for Transport for London has apologised to motorists for the cycle superhighways, citing that the plan was rushed, ill-thought through and ill-judged.

Common Claims by Critics:

The new cycle lanes take up too much of the road.
Less road for cars equals more congestion, idle traffic and therefore pollution.
The cycle lanes are only used sufficiently during rush hour and are then quiet after.

It would definitely seem that there is an increase in road congestion, but those in favour of cycle lanes state that a big reason for this is an increase in roadworks in the capital. Additionally, they also claim that there is no direct evidence to suggest that pollution has increased due to more congestion when compared to the pollution that has been reduced due there being more cyclists on the road.

Those ‘For’ London’s New Cycle Lanes

On the opposite side of the coin, those that are ‘for’ the new and improved cycle lanes in London cite fewer road deaths, a reduction in congestion and pollution and an increased number of people switching to the healthier mode of transport.

There are more than 30% more cyclists on the roads compared to ten years ago, which is certainly a sizeable increase. However, those against the new cycle highways in London claim that almost all the cyclists are seen during rush hour with the lanes barely being used in between.

That increase in numbers will also have an impact on the amount of pollution being created on the roads as more commuters turn to bicycles instead of cars. Add to that the decrease in road fatalities and the increased health of those getting exercise and you can see that supporters of the new cycle lanes make some good points.

Common Claims by Supporters:

Numbers of cyclists using these routes has increased by 60%.
More cyclists on the roads means less pollution.
A sizeable reduction in cyclist road deaths.

There is no disputing that there are major benefits to getting more people on bikes and less in cars, especially regarding health and pollution – but is it enough? Congestion is still there, traffic is still there and both are at much higher rates than has been seen in many years. The congestion charge might have worked for a while, but that has ultimately failed and now could we see this latest policy fail as well?

So, Who is Right?

It is difficult to tell right now until more figures have been released and scientific evidence is there to back up either view.

It is important to note that these new cycle lanes were implemented by those who had their hearts in the right place and for the right purpose. The issue now is could they now be counterproductive to the goal they are trying to achieve? Could they be contributing to an increase in the very factors that they were designed to reduce?

No matter what your view on these new cycle lanes, there is still something that is plain to see – congestion in the capital is at worse levels than before the congestion charge was brought in. Whether this is an increase in private vehicles, private hire cabs, ‘uber’ cars or vehicles delivering increasing amounts of online shopping or bicycles, is irrelevant.

Congestion is causing pollution which directly affects the health and life expectancy of anyone exposed to it. Something needs to be done for both our sakes and for the sake of the planet.